<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Intellectual Property Directions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com</link>
	<description>TechRoadmap discusses Intellectual Property issues from a non-legal perspective</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Patent System Woes by ebstein</title>
		<link>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2010/02/23/patent-system-woes/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>ebstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/?p=119#comment-778</guid>
		<description>Actually that's * Brad * Feld's blog. Though I share some concerns with Bruce and Brad on how well the patent system is matched to today's innovation process, many similar concerns could be applied to other areas where high-priced lawyers and litigation are found.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually that&#8217;s * Brad * Feld&#8217;s blog. Though I share some concerns with Bruce and Brad on how well the patent system is matched to today&#8217;s innovation process, many similar concerns could be applied to other areas where high-priced lawyers and litigation are found.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who is Ray Bilski? OH! It&#8217;s &#8220;in re Bilski&#8221; by Intellectual Property Directions » A Wooden Stake Through Biz Method Patents?</title>
		<link>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2008/11/02/who-is-ray-bilski-oh-its-in-re-bilski/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Intellectual Property Directions » A Wooden Stake Through Biz Method Patents?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/?p=66#comment-734</guid>
		<description>[...] be dead but that the contorted CAFC reasoning may be thrown out as well. As I wrote last November (IP Directions 11/2/08), the very basis of the US patent system is the Constitutional phrase: “Congress shall have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be dead but that the contorted CAFC reasoning may be thrown out as well. As I wrote last November (IP Directions 11/2/08), the very basis of the US patent system is the Constitutional phrase: “Congress shall have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Time Bomb In Your Patent Application? by Intellectual Property Directions » Time Bombs - A Continuation</title>
		<link>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2009/09/24/a-time-bomb-in-your-patent-application/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Intellectual Property Directions » Time Bombs - A Continuation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/?p=97#comment-670</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171;&#160;A Time Bomb In Your Patent Application?       01 10 2009 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo;&nbsp;A Time Bomb In Your Patent Application?       01 10 2009 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
