<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who is Ray Bilski? OH! It&#8217;s &#8220;in re Bilski&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2008/11/02/who-is-ray-bilski-oh-its-in-re-bilski/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2008/11/02/who-is-ray-bilski-oh-its-in-re-bilski/</link>
	<description>TechRoadmap discusses Intellectual Property issues from a non-legal perspective</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Intellectual Property Directions » A Wooden Stake Through Biz Method Patents?</title>
		<link>http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2008/11/02/who-is-ray-bilski-oh-its-in-re-bilski/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Intellectual Property Directions » A Wooden Stake Through Biz Method Patents?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/?p=66#comment-734</guid>
		<description>[...] be dead but that the contorted CAFC reasoning may be thrown out as well. As I wrote last November (IP Directions 11/2/08), the very basis of the US patent system is the Constitutional phrase: “Congress shall have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be dead but that the contorted CAFC reasoning may be thrown out as well. As I wrote last November (IP Directions 11/2/08), the very basis of the US patent system is the Constitutional phrase: “Congress shall have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
